One man exclaiming with his hands while 2 people watch

Employment Law Alert - Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Harassment Now Outlawed

Article
Circle Arrow Get the Story
Many employers require employees to sign agreements that contain arbitration provisions. Under such provisions, employees forgo bringing claims arising out of their employment in court and instead agree that an arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators will decide such disputes. Employers prefer arbitration because it affords a cloak of confidentiality, in contrast to most judicial proceedings, which are open to the public. 


 
Yesterday, President Biden signed the “Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021,” which represents another step forward for the #MeToo movement. The new legislation amends the Federal Arbitration Act and provides that, notwithstanding the existence of a predispute arbitration agreement or predispute joint-action waiver, a claimant can bring sexual assault or sexual harassment claims in court. The Act also allows such a person to enter into an arbitration agreement or pursue such claims in arbitration at the time of the dispute should he or she so choose. The legislation will apply to disputes or claims that arise or accrue after the legislation is enacted. Now a court, rather than an arbitrator, will decide whether the Act applies.   
 
In 2019, in a similar effort to keep sexual assault claims out in the open, Virginia employers may recall that the General Assembly enacted Virginia Code § 40.1-28.01. That statute invalidated or proscribed nondisclosure or confidentiality agreements that conceal details related to sexual assault claims as a condition of employment.

Given the new law, employers should review any arbitration provisions in their employment agreements. Remember that employers and employees can still agree to arbitrate sexual assault/harassment claims after they have arisen, but employers may want to consider an appropriate “opt-out” provision. Now may also be a good time to review noncompetition covenants as the law regarding their enforceability changes constantly.       

The contents of this publication are intended for general information only and should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion on specific facts and circumstances. Copyright 2026.

Jump to Page

Kaufman & Canoles, P.C. Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek