Our team represents individual property owners, businesses, and tenants in all phases of the eminent domain process. Clients appreciate that we’re a “one-stop shop” providing comprehensive representation to our clients impacted by eminent domain.
We’ll handle all aspects of a condemnation matter, from pre-condemnation planning with the support of our team of land use attorneys, negotiation and litigation with our team of eminent domain trial attorneys, and tax and estate planning with the support of our tax and trust and estate attorneys for any settlement or award received.
- Represented individual and business landowners in condemnation matters related to the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, with substantial experience negotiating settlements for landowners and preparing agreements with terms protecting the landowner’s property rights
- Represented numerous shopping centers, retailers, and restaurants in eminent domain cases filed by VDOT, the federal government, and localities
- Represented the owners of hotel properties, medical complexes, vacant parcels, storage facilities, and a wide variety of other types of investment properties in eminent domain cases
- Represented residential property owners in eminent domain actions filed by VDOT, localities, and utility providers
- Represented landowners and tenants in disputes concerning relocation expenses
Impacting the property’s development plans. A church in Newport News had plans to expand the church and ensure that its mission continued. VDOT’s project changed the property’s access and resulted in the taking of a small portion of the church’s property, putting expansion plans at risk. VDOT determined the church’s property was not damaged and offered just compensation of $96,000. Kaufman & Canoles prevailed in multiple hearings before the Court, and was able to obtain a favorable settlement for the church of $1.95 million, approximately $1.85 million above VDOT’s offer.
Impacting access. VDOT’s project and corresponding taking resulted in a new median in front of one of three entrances for the property, and easements along the front of the property. Access for the property was impacted, and the easements negatively impacted the property. VDOT offered $119,000 as just compensation. The landowner’s appraiser determined just compensation to be $2,391,883. VDOT refused to settle for a reasonable amount, and we took the case to trial before a jury in 2018. With Kaufman & Canoles’ help, the jury unanimously agreed with the landowner and awarded just compensation of $2,391.883. The landowner also received reimbursement for costs of approximately $100,000.
Other examples include:
Agricultural land – Pipeline easement
Offer: $38,200
Result: $702,017
Sand mining site – Pipeline easement
Offer: $70,250
Result: $850,000
Agricultural land – pipeline easement
Offer: $68,900
Result: $705,000
Wetlands mitigation site – pipeline easement
Offer: $700,000
Result: $2,075,000
Commercial land – Impacted Access
Offer: $75,080
Award: $235,000
Commercial site – total taking
Result: Over $300,000 more than the offer
Commercial site – Impacted parking
Offer: $714,010
Result: $1,194,810 plus conveyed an adjacent parcel
Residential parcel – Partial take and storm water detention pond installed
Offer: $290,285
Result: $440,000
Residential site – Partial taking and utility easement installed
Offer: $28,500
Result: $102,000
Farm – Pipeline easement
Offer: $20,400
Result: $125,000
Convenience Store – Partial taking with impacted parking
Offer: $149,375
Result: $274,000
Hotel – Taking and removal of buffer and trees at front of property
Offer: $29,718
Result: $65,000
Residential home – temporary slope easement (tying in road to property)
Offer: $1,000
Result: $76,500
*Past case results do not indicate or guarantee future results. Every case has unique facts and circumstances and must be considered on its own merit.
